Mentalbility: A Podcast: Episode # 1

‘Mental Health & Wellness” An opnmnd podcast (c)

A blog post of the podcast –

My name is Paul Avard, I’m a Registered Hypnotherapist here in the UK (CNHC & NCHP). I have my own practice as a hypnotherapist; I also practice as a counsellor using the solution focus approach and have done for many years. Additionally, I work for Change, Birmingham Brief Therapy – www.https://changebrieftherapy.org on one day a week, where I also I teach solution focus practice and mentor counsellors and trainee counsellors for Change and I am, and have been a member of the United Kingdom Association of Solution Focus Practice for a long time. (UKASFP). I was also Chair of Change for many years.

A Bit of Biography:

For over thirty years, I worked as a specialist, special needs teacher, working with secondary age (US, High School), students, aged 11 – 18 who had emotional and other behavioural issues. I came into special ed., almost by accident – but, to be honest, I found classroom, subject teaching, tedious and repetitious with little opportunity to be truly creative, very different from the years I spent in special ed.

The educational support service I worked for was closed down in 2012 / 13 and I was made redundant, however, by then I had trained as a hypnotherapist and was able to set up my own practice in the area where I live.

I originally trained as a teacher intending to teach social science and sociology, so, unlike many in the psychological services, I don’t have a psychology background, and thankfully this freedom is more helpful for me, for it frees me from being hidebound in and with prescriptive practices. I know lots of practitioners who have backgrounds other than in psychology and this seems to free them up too, helping them to be open-minded about the things they do in their day to day work.

Having said that, I also know some exceptional practitioners who DO have a psychological – either in terms of training, or academic, background. As with everything else in life, it is the individual we’re thinking of, and you cannot, safely, ever lump people together and pull out a single, specific example of … whatever.

I successfully work with people with all sorts of issues: from wanting to eat less to those struggling with drug, alcohol and pornography addictions; anxiety, various phobias, incessant pain and virtually anything else you can think of. I currently support a terminally-ill client and a couple with OCD (so-called) and a young man on the autistic spectrum, who’s also on my client list, and for what it’s worth I also work with an astro-physics student … there is NOT a single client who is typical, all of you are totally INDIVIDUAL…

This podcast arises out of my desire to become more involved in working with the wider community. However, since I am disabled and registered as such, I have becom less and less mobile as I get older, it becomes easier for me to use technology to reach out to that wider community. And reaching out is what I want to do…

‘Mentalbility’ is called that because I believe that no matter what it is that bothers you, we all have this amazing ability to, with help, to get over things that we find distressing and get back on track – not my track, but the track that you, or someone like you wants to follow.

And it’s important that you understand that I don’t ever try to get others to follow my way of doing things or believing what I believe. After all, I can only be certain that what I do, works for me, I have no way, really, truthfully and honestly of knowing if it would work for you. So, the people I do work with, directly or indirectly, know that I will try to help them co-create the futures they want, not DIRECT them to a future I think they might want. Because I can’t before you ask, since I’m not them, I’m simply me….

With the kind of approaches I use, that is Ericksonian hypnotherapy and Solution Focus Practice, it can only ever be about helping others to help themselves. I don’t, ever, and it is worth repeating, dictate do this that or the other to clients or friends who come to me to ask for help.

So, as this podcast develops, I hope it will be an organic mix of current thinking; interviews with service users receiving help; interviews with counsellors and others; me talking with thinkers, shapers and movers and other practitioners of all types; academics – It won’t be about ‘do this because I say this is good for you’.

I don’t, really, know what it will ‘look’ like, I suppose, like anything ‘organic’ it will take on the shape that best suits IT

I will indicate sources, by which I mean books, magazines, articles or organisations, providing useful, helpful and ever-changing information – Episode information will contain references so you can keep up, do your own reading, and so on, and each episode will have a supporting blog post, which can be found at https://paulavard.co.uk  

I’m aiming for a two-weekly gap between episodes, so that you have time to listen and digest, think and come back at me.

It would be great if there could be a ‘dialogue’ between you and me; so please give feedback, make useful comments and ask questions as we go along. As someone once said, “I may not know the answer, however, I probably know someone who does …”

And your questions will likely inform the shape of future episodes, so let’s work together, even if you don’t agree with me — and there will be times when you won’t,   I guess …

So, help me to help you, please.

Paul

Mental Well-Being – How do You Know You’re Well, Mentally?

Mental Well-Being:

I wonder, how do YOU know your mental well-being is, well, well and that the whole you is functioning in ways that tell you you’re being the best you you can be, mentally speaking?

Good question, and one I think it would be helpful if MORE people asked.

Men check their testicles, women their breasts; the NHS checks everyone, (at least those people over a certain age) for whether there’s blood showing in their bowel movements – to catch bowel cancer.  Men over 60+, well,  we’re screened to ensure our aortic artery isn’t showing signs of furring up; and further, women have cervical screening (at least from age 25 – 64) and mammograms;  and so on.

Problem is, those things I’ve mentioned in the paragraph above are all medical conditions, and therefore something we know CAN be screened for and it helps if you believe they can.

Mental ill health however, is somewhat less screenable; ALTHOUGH there are weighty tomes, like the DSM-V (US) – the classification manual which enables health professionals, at least in the US, to diagnose and recognise and treat mental ill health when it’s sat opposite them. DSM – V is, in full, ‘The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (of Mental Disorders) volume 5 (V – Roman Numerals).

And, not to be outdone, the rest of the world has ‘The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders’, published by the WHO (World Health Organisation) which has recently decided that Gaming Addiction is a disease, that can be classified as such, and therefore, can, presumably be treated.

ICD, if you are really interested, stands for, in full, ‘International (Statistical) Classification of Diseases (and Related Health Problems)’.

Don’t you just love acronyms? That was rhetorical, by the way. Although there’s nothing to stop you adding a comment if you want to, at the end.

Public Health:

Some, such as Katherine Johnson, have argued that the public health agenda has moved over the last several years such that there is nowadays an “… increasing apprehension for ‘global health’ such that public health concerns are no longer seen as constrained by national boundaries …” (Johnson, 2012, p269), and that we are becoming more concerned about inequalities in health (McFarlane, et al 2008, in Johnson, ibid). And as Johnson goes on to suggest, this move to equalise resources and opportunities has, under the tenets of the WHO (World Health Organisation) also moved to include ‘mental health’ – ‘no health without mental health’ (ibid).

Which,  laudable though it is, means that, say, such as when The Lancet launched its ‘Movement for Global Mental Health’ (MGMH) (ibid), it was based upon a ‘medical framework’ (ibid) utilising diagnosis and ‘appropriate’ interventions in the field of mental health disorder, as opposed to the community psychology approach of collective action as a means of promoting good mental health and well-being.

Little is done by MGMH to ameliorate the effects of globalisation and the continued growth of neo-liberalism: instead the focus is upon ways to “…find cost effective methods to alleviate the ‘global burden of disease’…” (Johnson, 2012 ibid p, 270) since large parts of the world are low to middle income states and countries  and without sufficient income of their own for ‘scaling up services for mental disorders’ (Lancet Global Mental Health Group, 2007, p.87 in Johnson 2012, ibid).

It is quite clever of states and nation states – mostly in the west, I will emphasise, to place the burden for this growth in the rate and nature of the perceived ‘disease’ of mental ill health on those who suffer from the disease.

This reframes illness – both physical and mental – as pertaining to the individual; in terms of the root causes of that illness, and in doing this, seeks ways to blame the individual, or their community, or their environment with a view to firmly denying that the real cause of much of what we consider illness, particularly mental ‘illness’, is actually to be found in the socio-economic models that bind the citizenry to the state, and over which we have no control, unfortunately.

Carl Walker puts this argument quite succinctly in a paper in “Community Psychology & the Socio-Economics of Mental Distress” (2012) when he quotes Lemke (2001) who suggests ‘… The neoliberal rationality of government consists of a number of ideologically coherent political precepts drawn together by a fundamental belief in the superiority of the free market over intervention by the apparatuses of the state. Collectively these precepts are predicated on a reconfiguration of the social as individual and a series of discursive moves to to responsibilize  individuals and families such that social risks like illness, unemployment and poverty are transformed into problems of self-care…’(Lemke, 2001, in Walker, Johnson & Cunningham, Eds, 2012, p11).

So, if you struggle with psychological or physical ill-health, the blame rests firmly with you – along with your poverty, lack of education, housing, employment and so on.

This is a theme I will return to in my next blog-post, along with the role that big Pharma now plays in ensuring that the medication that is unnecessarily prescribed for psychological issues, leads to those self same issues, for which more drugs of the same or similar kinds, with the same or similar outcomes,  are then further prescribed, and so it goes, ad infinitum...

Refs:

Walker, C; Johnson, K & Cunningham, L Eds (2012): “Community Psychology & the Socio-economics of Mental Distress – International Perspectives”   Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, UK

Lemke, T (2001)’The birth of bio-politics’ Michel Foucault’s lecture at The College de France on neo-liberal governmentality.  Economy and Society, 30(2), 190 – 207.201

Paul